AND AFTER JIMI, WILLIAM BLAKE . . .
250 years old today. In The Bob Dylan Encyclopedia you'll find him on pages 51-55, 61, 179, 196, 215-220, 246, 256, 257, 363, 415, 451, 529, 619 and 689. There are few characters in English literature and art as wholly compelling - his work so immediately recognisable and distinctive, his life so affecting, and the fusion of art and life so powerful at bringing a whole era of London alive. If you haven't read it, I recommend Peter Ackroyd's Blake (1995). As for Dylan connections, well they may not be important in the huge totality that is Blake, but they've been mooted in writings about Dylan since at least the late 1960s, when Greil Marcus, in the San Francisco Express-Times, used a poem of Blake's to show the idiocy of A.J. Weberman's approach to code-cracking "interpretations" of Dylan; and the first edition of Song & Dance Man (1972) compared a particular Blake prose-poem passage with Dylan's sleevenotes to Highway 61 Revisited.Porter and his friends are complaining as if there were just one warping of Blake’s otherwise correct and static reputation. It’s never been like that. Max Plowman, writing his irrepressible Introduction to the Study of Blake in the 1920s, felt that at last ‘the day seems to be not far distance when… apologies will be unnecessary and the complete Blake will be no longer regarded as a narcotic for numbskulls, but will stare every university undergraduate full in the face.’ "












0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home